320 inspections with five result states. 300 NCRs with severity, disposition and cost on the row. 120 CAPAs with overdue days, progress and a risk score. 185 NCRs open at $771K of exposure — and one quarantined lot with 48 units already shipped.
LOT-CTL-8821 is in quarantine with 48 units in the field. The alert prices the exposure at $181K and names the critical NCR behind it. That is the conversation quality systems usually postpone.
quality.cedxsystems.com — live build
Runs on demo data. Plant East is the software's demo plant, August 2026.
185 open NCRs98 critical or major · $771K exposure
79 open CAPAs · 29 overdue$998K of cost in flight
First-pass yield 24.7%79 pass of 320 inspections
What it is
Three registers, one defect record.
320 inspections, five result states
Pass 79, Fail 68, Conditional 70, Hold 103 — the chips count the catalog. Types run In-process, Final, Incoming, Dock and First-article, and the defect codes are the real vocabulary: dimensional OOS, torque under, solder void, pack damage, label mismatch.
Defect count and code on every row
Plant and lot on every inspection
171 fail/hold rows need NCR review
quality — screen-2
300 NCRs with disposition and cost
NCR-2271 — the controller reboot loop — sits Critical, in review, on Hold at $55K against 6 units. Dispositions run Hold, Return, Scrap, Rework and Use as-is; quantity, lot and SKU are on every row.
CAPA-1042 — solder process control on pad A3 — is 41 days overdue at 55% progress with risk 100. Phases run Investigating, Implementing, Verification; the register carries $998K of open cost.
Overdue days and progress % per row
Risk score — 100 on the worst two
29 of 79 open CAPAs overdue
quality — screen-4
Product tour
Four screens, captured from the running build.
Not a mockup and not a concept deck. This is what opens at /app/quality.
quality.cedxsystems.com
01 — Overview
The quality brief, with aging on it
Open NCRs 185, open CAPAs 79 with 29 overdue, 4 CAPAs at aging risk 70 or more, FPY 24.7%, 58 quarantine lots, $771K of undispositioned exposure. The health ring reads 95 — aging OK — and the alerts say what is testing it.
System health 95, broken into four inputs
Highest-cost open NCR: NCR-2271 at $55K
Opened-vs-closed chart, weekly
02 — Inspections
Where the defect is born
320 inspections with type, SKU, lot, result, defect count, code, plant and date. INS-43027 came back Conditional with 7 defects, dimensional OOS, in process — the row the NCR will quote.
Five result chips with counts
First-article inspections in the same register
CSV export of the filtered view
03 — NCRs
The nonconformance, priced
300 NCRs with title, severity, status, disposition, SKU, lot, quantity, cost and opened date. The solder void on CTL-4400 pad A3 holds 48 units at $42K — the same lot the overview alert is about.
$771K open exposure across 185 rows
Dispositions from Scrap to Use as-is
Search by NCR, title or SKU
04 — CAPAs
The fix, with a risk score on it
120 CAPAs with phase, status, severity, overdue days, progress, risk, due and owner. The two criticals at risk 100 are 41 and 30 days overdue — the register does not let them fade.
Open cost of $998K across the register
Phase chips: Investigating to Closed
Overdue days sorted worst-first
Who runs it
Three roles keep the register honest.
Roles, not references. We have no named customers yet, so nobody in these photographs is quoted, credited or claimed as one.
Supplier quality and audits
AUD-310 has 3 open findings with the supplier's score at 75 and CAPA lag. The PSU batch fails behind CAPA-1035 are 17 days overdue at $19K.
open findings · 3
Document and process control
Owns the controlled documents the inspections cite — torque-under and solder-void codes trace to a released procedure, not a memory.
inspections · 320
Quality engineering
Works the CAPA register: 29 overdue, two criticals at risk 100, and the firmware-watchdog CAPA still investigating at $55K.
CAPA risk · 100
The shape of it
What the demo plant's quality record looks like.
Every figure below is legible in the captures above. Nothing here is a projection of your plant — it is the state of the demo data.
185open NCRs$771K exposure · 98 crit+major
79open CAPAs29 overdue · $998K in flight
24.7%first-pass yield79 pass of 320
58quarantine lotsone with 48 units shipped
Root-caused alerts, priced on screensymptom → cause → fix · demo plant
LOT-CTL-8821 quarantine — 48 units shipped, critical NCR with field exposure$181K
CAPA-1030 firmware watchdog — 30 days overdue, still investigating$55K
CAPA-1042 solder process — 41 days overdue, stuck implementing at 55%$42K
Inspections by result79 pass of 320 — the 24.7% FPY
Pass · 79
Fail or hold · 171 need NCR review
Conditional · 70
System health95 — aging OK, from the overview ring
95
Aging OK — 4 CAPAs at risk ≥ 70
Overdue CAPAs · 29 of 79 open
How it runs
A defect's life, in the order it actually happens.
01
Inspect
An inspection lands with type, lot and defect code — INS-43027 conditional, 7 defects, dimensional OOS, in process.
02
Contain
Fail and hold results put lots in quarantine — 58 today, one with 48 units already in the field.
03
Disposition
The NCR gets severity, disposition and cost: NCR-2271 Critical, Hold, $55K, six units.
04
Prevent
The CAPA carries phase, progress and risk — CAPA-1042 at 55%, 41 days late, risk 100, until the fix verifies.
One record
The defect record starts upstream of quality.
The same codes appear on both sides of the wall: the solder void on CTL-4400 pad A3 is a reflow zone on the plant schedule, a held lot in the bins, a cost line on the ops overview.
Finding this out on the third call is worse for you than reading it here, and worse for us.
Quality is not generally available. What opens today is the live build on demo data — Plant East is the software's demo plant, not a customer.
We have no named customers to show you, so this page shows none. The owner names on the CAPA register are demo people, not our team and not yours.
The ISO 9001 marker in the demo header is the demo tenant's setting. Nothing on this page is a certification or compliance claim by CEDX, and no certification has been issued to CEDX for this product.
First-pass yield of 24.7% is the demo plant's number — low on purpose so the registers have something to say. It is not a benchmark.
The dollar exposures — $771K on NCRs, $998K on CAPAs — are computed from demo quantities. The arithmetic is on screen; the amounts are the demo's.
What we can evidence about hosting, encryption and access is on the security page.
Yes. Every screenshot is a capture of the running build, and you can open the same build at /app/quality. It runs on demo data — the demo Plant East.
Why is first-pass yield so low?
Because the demo plant fails on purpose. 79 of 320 inspections pass; 171 fail or hold rows feed the NCR register so you can see the whole pipeline working. Your yield would be computed the same way from your rows.
What is the difference between an NCR and a CAPA here?
The NCR is the defect: severity, disposition, quantity, cost — NCR-2271, the reboot loop, Critical on Hold at $55K. The CAPA is the fix: phase, progress, overdue days, risk — CAPA-1042, 41 days late at 55% progress. The overview prices both.
What does the risk score on a CAPA mean?
Aging and severity rolled into one number. Two critical CAPAs sit at 100 — 41 and 30 days overdue — and four CAPAs are flagged at risk 70 or more on the overview card. The inputs are on the row, so the score is checkable.
Does the page claim ISO 9001 certification?
No. The demo header carries an ISO 9001 marker as the demo tenant’s setting; it is not a CEDX certification and we do not hold one for this product. What we can evidence is on the security page.
What happens to a quarantined lot?
It waits for disposition. 58 lots are in quarantine or hold in the demo; LOT-CTL-8821 is the hard case — 48 units already shipped, a critical NCR attached, $181K of exposure on the alert.
The register is running. Go and read it.
Live build, demo data, no card. Then ask how many days your oldest open CAPA has.