CEDX Slides · Workplace
Ninety decks at 71% average brand fit. The worst offender is named — a partner summit draft at 54% that mixed one kit's logos with another's colors — and the 70 library assets nobody uses stop showing up in search.
Brand drift is usually discovered by a customer. Here it is a number on the deck list: fit 43 on the board pack, next to fit 94 on the onboarding deck, same table, same kit.
Runs on demo data. Decks and people named on screen belong to the demo workspace.
What it is
The generate-outline bar turns a one-line brief — an enterprise pitch for a retail operations platform — into an eight-slide draft preview. The deck list underneath carries status, brand kit, views and fit per deck, so the fast start and the governed finish are the same object.
Templates carry slides, uses, fit and a brand kit per row. The locked ones — the enterprise pitch, the sales battlecard — are brand-controlled, so the decks that leave the building start from a structure nobody can quietly bend.
320 assets with use counts per deck: the primary wordmark appears 64 times across 38 decks; a legacy chart image appears 57 times in the wrong kit. The 70 assets with zero uses are flagged as archive candidates.
Product tour
Not a mockup and not a concept deck. This is what opens at /app/slides.
01 — Overview
Brand fit 71% with the alerts to match: the partner summit draft mixing kits, sixteen decks waiting in the approval queue, a deprecated partner mark still appearing in asset search. The healthy signal is there too — one title lockup reused cleanly across 40 decks.
02 — Decks
The onboarding deck at fit 94 and the board pack at fit 43 sit in the same sortable table — status, slides, brand kit, views, owner. Drift stops being a taste argument.
03 — Templates
The enablement module has started 54 decks at fit 92; the event-stage template has started 47 at fit 48 and needs work. Template quality is measured by what the template produces.
04 — Assets
Sort by uses and the working assets rise: wordmark, diagram set, banner. Sort to zero and the 70 dead assets rise — the archive candidates that still fill search results today.
Who runs it
Roles, not references. We have no named customers yet, so nobody in these photographs is quoted, credited or claimed as one.
Owns the approval queue and the template library. Sixteen decks waiting review is the week's list, and the fit-48 event template is on it.
waiting review · 16
Works from the locked templates. The battlecard and the pitch stay brand-controlled no matter how late the meeting prep runs.
locked templates · 49
The audience for the kit-mixing alert. Co-branded decks get one kit's logos and one kit's colors — the fit score says which.
partner summit fit · 54%The shape of it
Every figure below is legible in the captures above. Nothing here is a projection of your estate — it is the state of the demo data.
How it runs
The outline prompt turns a one-line brief into an eight-slide draft on the right kit — 1,462 decks have started from templates.
Assets come from the library with their kit attached, so a logo can only land where it belongs.
Decks move draft to approved with a fit score attached. The approval queue is 16 deep and visible.
Dead assets and deprecated marks surface as archive candidates instead of lurking in search results.
One record
A presentation is assembled from governed assets and verified content, on the same identity as everything else.
The brand library these decks draw from is the digital-asset manager's record — kits, marks and versions in one place.
CEDX DocsThe numbers and policies a deck quotes come from verified pages, with review dates attached.
CEDX DriveEvery exported deck is a governed file: who it is shared with, on what link, until when.
CEDX ReportsThe charts in the deck and the charts in the board pack read the same figures.
Limits
Finding this out on the third call is worse for you than reading it here, and worse for us.
Start
Open it right now
Your decks, your brand kits
Slides with the rest of it
Questions
Yes. Every screenshot is a capture of the running build and you can open the same build at /app/slides. It runs on demo data — the decks, templates and people belong to a demo workspace, not to a customer.
A per-deck score against the deck's assigned brand kit — logos, colors, lockups. The studio average is 71%; the flagged case on the overview is a partner draft at 54% that mixed one kit's logos with another's colors, with the cause printed next to the score.
Templates marked brand-controlled — 49 of the 100 in the demo library. Decks like the enterprise pitch and the sales battlecard start from a structure and kit that individual editors cannot quietly bend.
By counting placements. Every asset carries a use count and a deck count; the 70 assets at zero uses are flagged as archive candidates, and the alert notes they still fill search and brand kits today.
Yes — the hottest-assets table. The primary wordmark has 64 placements across 38 decks at fit 100; a title lockup is reused cleanly across 40 decks. Reuse is measured, not assumed.
No certification has been issued. What we can evidence about hosting, encryption, tenant isolation and production access is written up on the security page.
Live build, demo data, no card. Then count the logos in the last deck your team sent out.