CEDX Logistics · Operations
320 loads across TL, LTL, intermodal and parcel — 237 active, 39 exceptions, 126 slipping two hours or more. Empty miles priced at $21K, detention at $16K, and a scorecard that attributes $84K of detention to 24 carriers by name.
FR-8812 is invoiced at $2,688 against a $2,320 tariff — a 20.5% dispute flagged on the invoice line, not found in a quarterly audit. That is what the freight record is for.
Runs on demo data. The Chicago hub is the software's demo network, August 2026.
What it is
LD-10092 runs CHI to DFW on a TL at 371 miles, slipping 12 hours at $495, with the track age next to the slip. Mode, carrier, miles, slip, track and rate — the whole argument is one table wide.
RT-ATL-NWK runs 26% empty against a 10% network average, and the empty ≥ 18% filter isolates the lanes like it. Plan miles against actual miles is on every row — 860 planned, 910 actual on that lane.
Acceptance, on-time, loads, detention dollars and score per carrier. Lumen Fleet scores 98; Apex Freight runs 94% on-time while carrying $15K of detention; the weakest TL carrier in view scores 68 with $19K attributed.
Product tour
Not a mockup and not a concept deck. This is what opens at /app/logistics.
01 — Overview
Active loads 237, on-time 76.6%, detention risk 156 loads with free time low at $16K, empty-mile waste $21K, freight spend $218K, late ETA 126. The alerts do the arithmetic: LD-10482 has 0.4 hours of free time left after a 3.8-hour dwell at dock 3.
02 — Loads
320 loads with lane, mode, status, carrier, miles, slip, track and rate. The exception chip counts 39; the slip ≥ 2h count is 126. Sorted by slip, the worst is 12 hours and it says which carrier.
03 — Routes
48 tracked lanes with mode, stops, plan and actual miles, empty % and on-time %. The intermodal lane between the two coasts runs 2,100 planned against 2,180 actual at 24% empty — the deadhead is measurable, lane by lane.
04 — Carriers
24 carriers with acceptance, on-time, load count, detention dollars and score. $84K of detention is attributed across the list, so the quarterly conversation starts from the same table.
Who runs it
Roles, not references. We have no named customers yet, so nobody in these photographs is quoted, credited or claimed as one.
Owns the 126 slipping loads while the network sleeps. LD-10420's no-show dock burned the free time and stands at $2.1K of exposure before morning.
slipping ≥2h · 126
Works the exception queue: 39 loads need a touch, sorted by slip hours, the worst at 12. The track column says how stale the last update is.
exceptions · 39The scorecard meeting writes itself: 24 carriers, $84K of detention attributed, and one dispute flagged at +20.5% on the invoice line.
detention · $84KThe shape of it
Every figure below is legible in the captures above. Nothing here is a projection of your network — it is the state of the demo data.
How it runs
A load enters with lane, mode and rate — 56 tendered in view, carriers accepting or not on the scorecard.
The ETA board watches slip: 126 loads at two hours or more, LD-10092 the worst at 12.
Detention and no-shows price themselves — LD-10482 has 0.4 hours of free time left after a 3.8-hour dwell.
Freight lines reconcile against tariff: FR-8812 flagged at +20.5%, $2,688 against $2,320, on the invoice line.
One record
A load dwells at a dock the warehouse staffs, on a SKU the order book sold, hauled by a fleet the asset register meters. The demo estate keeps all four views.
The 3.8-hour dwell behind LD-10482's detention risk happened at a dock the WMS staffs — putaway age and detention are two views of the same wait.
CEDX ERPFreight spend of $218K sits against the same order book the ERP shows at $2.51M of open value.
CEDX AssetsThe fleet on the scorecard is also on the asset register — one truck's meter reads 4,820 of 5,000 hours.
CEDX InvoicingFR-8812's $468 dispute is a freight invoice line — the kind of document CEDX Invoicing exists to argue about.
Limits
Finding this out on the third call is worse for you than reading it here, and worse for us.
Start
Open it right now
Your lanes, your carriers
Logistics with the rest of it
Questions
Yes. Every screenshot is a capture of the running build, and you can open the same build at /app/logistics. It runs on demo data — the Chicago hub network.
Loads whose free time is nearly gone. 156 loads in the demo are flagged at $16K; LD-10482 is the worked example — 0.4 hours of free time left after dwelling 3.8 hours at dock 3, priced at $1.2K.
Deadhead miles between a drop and the next live load, priced. The demo carries 11,455 empty miles at $21K, and the route table shows which lanes produce them — RT-ATL-NWK runs 26% empty.
A rollup of what the table shows: acceptance, on-time, load count and detention dollars. Lumen Fleet scores 98; the weakest TL carrier in view scores 68 with $19K of detention attributed. The inputs are on the row, so the score is arguable from data, not from us.
It is a flag, honestly labelled: FR-8812's invoice of $2,688 against a $2,320 tariff is a +20.5% variance on a detention accessorial. What a person does with the flag is a process, and this page does not claim the software settles it.
No certification has been issued. What we can evidence about hosting, encryption, tenant isolation and production access is on the security page.
Live build, demo data, no card. Then check how much free time your busiest dock has left.