Five channels, one inbox. Every thread knows who is waiting on whom, for how long, and what it risks — so “I'll get back to them” becomes a queue you can clear, measured in hours.
The top signal in the demo inbox: a buyer compared pricing against an alternative in their last message. The recommended move is not “reply soon” — it is: send the differentiation one-pager before the next call.
conversations.cedxsystems.com — live build
Runs on demo data. The workspace named in the chrome is the demo tenant, not a customer.
93 buyers waitingmedian wait 2.8 hours, worst in view 13.4h
7.9% meeting rateacross active sequences
What it is
Three ways deals die in the inbox.
A needs-reply queue with wait times on every row
93 threads where the buyer spoke last, sorted by hours waiting — 13.4 at the top — with priority, channel, deal and owner. VIP waits are flagged in the subject line, and the first-response SLA is named when it is at risk.
Due soon 11 · snoozed 46 · multi-thread 55
VIP waits flagged: first-response SLA at risk
Channel chips filter the queue
conversations — screen-2
Multi-thread risk, scored per deal
When a deal's conversations spread across people and channels without coordination, the risk table scores it: the top deal cluster shows 4 open threads across 3 channels at risk 96. The fix is to multi-thread deliberately, not to hope.
15 deals flagged on the multi-thread card
Deal clusters with open counts and risk
Cadence health ring combines the signals
conversations — overview
Per-channel truth, not blended averages
Each channel reports threads, open, needs-reply, reply rate, SLA rate and median wait: SMS answers in 1.7 hours at 72% SLA; meetings wait 4.9 hours at 52%. You fix the channel that is actually broken.
Email 58.8% reply · social 82.5%
Avg SLA 59% — reply under 4 hours
Health and Mix tabs over the same table
conversations — screen-4
Product tour
Four screens, captured from the running build.
Not a mockup and not a concept deck. This is what opens at /app/conversations.
conversations.cedxsystems.com
01 — Overview
The conversation estate at a glance
195 open threads of 320, 93 needing reply, 136 at next-step risk. The cadence-health ring scores the book at 30 and itemises why: next-step risk, multi-thread, needs reply — each a number you can click into.
Touches versus replies, weekly
Threads by channel: 61–68 each
Root-caused alerts with the fix attached
02 — Inbox
Signals first, then the queue
The ranked stream leads with what changed: an alternative mentioned in the last message, two new stakeholders touching one deal's threads, a VIP waiting 8 hours on a meeting reply. Underneath, the needs-reply queue carries wait in hours.
10 signals ranked with weights
Accept routes the move into the day
Search by contact, deal or subject · CSV
03 — Threads
Every thread, with its touch count
The ledger: subject, channel, touches, status, owner and last activity. Security questionnaire, SSO requirements, MSA markup — the subjects read like a real quarter, and statuses run open, waiting, snoozed, won and lost.
All 320 · open 195 · won 48 · lost 50
Touches per thread: 2 to 16 in view
VIP flags survive into the list
04 — Channels
Five channels, five report cards
Email, meeting, call, social and SMS, each with reply rate, SLA rate and median wait. The blended 59% SLA conceals a 72% SMS desk and a 45% social channel — which is why the table exists.
Threads 61–68 per channel
Median wait: 1.7h SMS to 4.9h meetings
Filterable, exportable, no blending
Who runs it
Three roles live in this inbox.
Roles, not references. We have no named customers yet, so nobody in these photographs is quoted, credited or claimed as one.
Account executive
Clears the needs-reply queue by wait time. The 13.4-hour thread at the top is the first call of the day, not the one they remembered.
wait · 13.4h
SDR
Works the routed signals: a reply gone quiet, a new stakeholder to acknowledge, a one-pager to send before the next call.
signals · 10
Revenue leadership
Reads the cadence-health ring and the channel table. A 45% SLA on one channel is a staffing decision, made on evidence.
SLA · 59%
The shape of it
What the demo workspace actually looks like.
Every figure below is legible in the captures above. Nothing here is a projection of your estate — it is the state of the demo data.
320threads in the workspace195 open, 93 needing reply
2.8hmedian waitneeds-reply threads
136threads at next-step riskbreach ≥ 55%
59%average SLAreply under 4 hours
Reply rate by channelPer channel, from the Channels screen
Social channel82.5%
Call76.2%
SMS70.5%
Meeting67.7%
Email58.8%
Threads with nobody waiting227 of 320 clear · 93 buyers waiting
Clear · 227 threads
Needs reply · 93, median 2.8h
Deals clean of multi-thread risk15 of 140 deals flagged
89%
Clean · 125 deals
At risk · 15 deals
How it runs
A conversation day, in the order it actually happens.
01
Signals before scroll
The ranked stream leads the inbox: what changed overnight, weighted, with the move attached. The queue comes second.
02
Clear by wait, not by feel
Needs-reply sorts by hours waiting. The 13-hour thread at the top outranks the one you happen to like.
03
Thread the deal
New stakeholders get acknowledged and added — the stakeholder-surge signal exists because single-threaded deals die quietly.
04
Read the channels honestly
Weekly, per channel: reply rate, SLA, median wait. Fix the broken one; leave the rest alone.
One record
The thread hangs off the deal the estate already keeps.
A conversation is not a separate silo — it is the living edge of the same account and deal record.
Finding this out on the third call is worse for you than reading it here, and worse for us.
Conversations is not generally available. What opens today is the live build running on demo data — the workspace in the chrome is the demo tenant, not a customer.
We have no named customers to show you, so this page shows none. The contacts and threads in the captures are demo data, not references.
Channel coverage is the five channels you see — email, call, meeting, social and SMS. What connecting your own accounts involves is a setup conversation, not a page claim.
Wait-time and SLA figures are the demo workspace's state. They are evidence of the mechanism, not benchmarks for your team.
No audit or compliance certification has been issued. What we can evidence about hosting, encryption and access is on the security page.
Yes. Every screenshot is a capture of the running build at /app/conversations, on demo data. The demo workspace is named in the chrome.
What counts as needs-reply?
Any thread where the buyer spoke last. The queue shows 93 of them with wait in hours, priority and owner — and a VIP flag where the contact's seniority makes the wait expensive.
What is multi-thread risk?
A deal whose conversations spread across people and channels without coordination. The risk table scores it — 4 open threads across 3 channels at 96 — and the recommended move is to acknowledge and add the new stakeholders, not to bypass them.
Does it record calls?
The captures show call as a channel with its own reply and SLA rates. What call capture and recording involve for your jurisdiction is a setup and counsel conversation; we are not claiming it on this page.
Is Conversations audited or certified?
No certification has been issued. What we can evidence about hosting, encryption, tenant isolation and production access is written up on the security page.
The inbox is running. Go and look at it.
Live build, demo data, no card. Then ask how many of your own buyers spoke last — and for how long.