CEDX Meet · Workplace
320 meetings in the catalog — attendance 83%, no-show rate 20%, median ROI 66. The lowest-scoring meetings are tabled with what they cost, and 23 rooms sit idle enough to reclaim.
The ROI column changes the conversation. A recurring status meeting with zero decisions, attendance under 70% and a four-figure cost stops being tradition and starts being a line item.
Runs on demo data. Meeting names and people on screen belong to the demo workspace.
What it is
Every ended meeting carries its invite count, attendance percentage and whether a notes artifact exists. An all-hands with 115 invitees at 86% sits next to a two-person account plan at 100% — both scored, both searchable.
Room utilisation is measured over 30 days: average 36%, four rooms under pressure above 75%, and 23 rooms idling below 30% — flagged as reclaim candidates with capacity, building and next booking on the row.
180 recordings with honest states: 91 ready, 28 still processing, 33 failed, 28 expiring. Views, minutes, file size and host per row — a failed recording is a row you can act on, not a silent gap.
Product tour
Not a mockup and not a concept deck. This is what opens at /app/meet.
01 — Overview
Attendance 83%, no-show 20%, median ROI 66 — and the alerts that follow: external no-shows elevated at 14% against a 9% baseline, twelve meetings under ROI 40, seven recordings stuck in processing past two hours.
02 — Meetings
Upcoming 102, live 35, ended 183, cancelled 35. A churn review with 6 invitees at 100% attendance and a pipeline review at 64% are in the same table, comparably scored.
03 — Rooms
Skyline seats 40 and runs at 57%; Focus 1 seats 20 and runs at 80% with 57 bookings in 30 days. Capacity planning from data, not from complaints about booking.
04 — Recordings
Ready recordings carry views and sizes; the failed and expiring ones carry their state openly. An interview panel recording at 1.2 GB marked expiring is a decision prompt, not a storage surprise.
Who runs it
Roles, not references. We have no named customers yet, so nobody in these photographs is quoted, credited or claimed as one.
Runs the panel interviews in the ledger — 15-minute slots, 100% attendance, notes attached. The expiring recordings queue is theirs to clear.
interviews · 17 ended
Owns the 22 all-hands in the ended set. Attendance, notes coverage and the recording's view count are the report card.
all-hands · 115 invitees peak
Works the rooms table. Twenty-three idle rooms under 30% utilisation is a floor-plan decision with evidence attached.
idle rooms · 23The shape of it
Every figure below is legible in the captures above. Nothing here is a projection of your estate — it is the state of the demo data.
How it runs
The meeting lands from the calendar with its invite list, room and type — team, external, all-hands, interview.
Attendance is measured against invites. No-shows count — 20% of invitees in the current view, elevated on external meetings.
Notes and recordings attach to the same record. Coverage is 47% against an 85% target, and the gap is on the overview, not in a footnote.
Ended meetings get an ROI score. Recurring meetings that stop earning their slot surface in the lowest-ROI queue with a cost next to them.
One record
A meeting is not a standalone event. It shares identity with the calendar that scheduled it and the conversation that continues it.
Every meeting here was an event there first — load scores and conflicts follow the meeting into the room.
CEDX BookingsExternally booked sessions arrive with their show-rate history and no-show risk already scored.
CEDX ChatThe decision the meeting reached lands in the channel recap the same day, on the same record.
CEDX DriveRecordings and shared decks are files with links, expiry and risk scores — Drive governs where they live.
Limits
Finding this out on the third call is worse for you than reading it here, and worse for us.
Start
Open it right now
Your meetings, your rooms
Meet with the rest of it
Questions
Yes. Every screenshot is a capture of the running build and you can open the same build at /app/meet. It runs on demo data — the meetings, rooms and people belong to a demo workspace, not to a customer.
Each ended meeting is scored on what it produced — the demo workspace's median is 66, with the bottom of the table at 5. The overview root-causes the pattern: recurring status meetings with zero decisions and attendance under 70%. The score exists so that pattern has a number.
They sit next to the ROI scores in the lowest-ROI queue — $8.4K for the pipeline review down to $2.4K for the weekly status dump, estimated by the demo workspace from its own invite lists and durations.
The share of ended meetings with a notes artifact — 86 with notes, 28 partial, 69 with none, of 183 ended. The target of 85% is printed on the ring itself, so the gap is the workspace's own admission.
That is what the rooms table does: 23 rooms under 30% utilisation over 30 days are listed as reclaim candidates, with capacity, booking counts and next booking per row.
No certification has been issued. What we can evidence about hosting, encryption, tenant isolation and production access is written up on the security page.
Live build, demo data, no card. Then look at your own weekly status meeting's attendance.